This novel intrigues me. I always read it straight through, twice, in an attempt to ‘pin it down’, but always I’m left with questions about exactly which issues Austen can be considered to be addressing, and which stance she is questioning. Fanny is a far from an engaging character, initially; nonetheless we are forced to take her perspective on events, almost consistently. That said, are we also given a perspective on Edmund’s character that differs from Fanny’s? Austen dwells at length on the reasons for the final outcome of events, in the final chapter, and indicates a probable alternative ending. How does this chapter affect the overall nature of the text? Can the novel be viewed as morally conservative, or is it more critical – more subversive?
Rozema’s adaptation is both provocative and dreadful. What explanations can be given for Rozema’s decision to make Fanny so feisty, politically aware and opinionated? Why does slavery have such prominence in the film despite being so muted a topic in the novel? And what is the purpose of the homo-eroticism? Can these changes be explained solely in terms of making the action in the text more accessible to a modern audience? Do they enhance or detract from the adaptation?